Housing

Let Montreal Build The Housing It Is Famous For

Quebec should listen to its municipalities and sign-on to the Federal Housing Infrastructure Fund

By Construisons MontréalPublished on Apr 20, 2024

The Federal government recently announced1 another sequel to its “Cash for housing density” program. This latest one called the “Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund” is targeted at provinces. It is even larger than the previous “Housing Accelerator Fund”, which was targeted at municipalities.2 3 This program aims to remove both the infrastructure and zoning roadblocks which prevent housing from being built.

It can be tempting to blame municipalities for causing this housing crisis by not doing upzones, but the truth is upgrading infrastructure on former suburban streets is extremely expensive4. As we saw from the recent kerfuffle in Ontario over Bill 23, municipalities universally protested upzones over finances more than classic NIMBY issues like shadows and character5. The municipalities complained they were not able to afford the infrastructure, low incoming housing and amenities that new neighbors would require6. The Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund does a good job of addressing these financial concerns.

Our Municipalities Want Money

Included in the club of Canadian municipalities asking for infrastructure funding is the Montreal Metropolitan Community (MMC) which represents around half the population of the province. The latest CMHC housing report shows Montreal as the metro area in Canada building the least housing, actually building less than last year7. This is a catastrophic situation for its large population of renters, guaranteeing steep rent increases in upcoming years8. However the region has indicated it wants to build more housing, including more deeply affordable housing, it just needs financial support for basic infrastructure and transit from the province9 10 11.

Money from the government is especially important in Quebec because unlike other provinces large prescriptive “development fees” are not added to developments to cover the cost of upgrades12. Municipalities in Quebec have generally opted for a policy of higher tax rates and lower fees13 with charges on a case by case basis. This system has its merits, but during times of extended rapid development like now, the costs start to outpace the current local taxbase. Current residents are effectively forced to “front the money” for thousands of neighbors who do not currently exist.

The Federal Government Has Municipalities Covered

The federal announcements should be music to the ears of residents of the MMC. It covers many of the critical costs of doing upzoning such as water treatment and solid waste systems14. This cash injection would free up municipal funding to do other things like transit, policing and parks. Furthermore it would allow municipalities to feel more secure about moving ahead on upcoming projects such as the long delayed Namur-Hippodrome development15.

The structure of these programs so far is to make a simple deal. To access this money for infrastructure (Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund), affordable housing (Canada Rental Protection Fund16) or soon, transit (As Yet Unnamed17) cities must upzone and make it easier to build new housing.

The program does this through asking directly for “four units as-of-right” and to “allow more ‘missing middle’ homes, including duplexes, triplexes, townhouses, and other multi-unit apartments”. The upcoming transit funding continues on this theme by asking to remove parking minimums and allow high density development within 800 meters of rapid transit stations18.

Provincial Whining

The reception of these programs has been mixed. The government of British Columbia has already basically met the criteria for the transit fund and is in a situation where they will be able to get cash in their pocket FAST for things they are already doing19. Good job BC!

In Ontario the provincial government has been complaining about the federal program “Telling us what to do”, although the program isn’t forcing anyone to do anything. But luckily for Ontario’s cities, if the province doesn’t want to sign on, the money will be offered directly to the cities through the Housing Accelerator Fund20. No cities have to sign onto that if they don’t want to, but enough probably will to do a lot of good.

However, Quebec’s municipalities which are desperate for funding are going to have to wait and hope for the province. This is because Quebec’s provincial law prevents municipalities from negotiating deals with the federal government21. If the government of Quebec does not strike a deal with the federal government, municipalities in Quebec will not get a chance at bat. The money will go into the Housing Accelerator Fund and all be spent elsewhere in Canada.

The Point

The government of Quebec voluntarily took on the responsibility of negotiating on our behalf with the federal government in the name of Quebec’s municipalities. Now those municipalities are saying they want to build housing, but they can’t do this without money for the necessary infrastructure. It's time for the province to prove it can handle this responsibility.

It isn’t accurate to accuse this optional program of being some external imposition22. If anywhere in Canada inspired a program to build thousands of fourplexes, it is Quebec. This program is an opportunity to do what we do best. The government of Quebec should sign the deal and let Montreal get to work building the type of medium density housing that it is already famous for.


  1. "Growi Section 1.1 Building More Homes" Chapter 1: More Affordable Homes | Budget 2024 (canada.ca)
  2. Canada 2024 Budget: Section 1.1 A New Canada Infrastructure Housing Fund", Chapter 1: More Affordable Homes | Budget 2024 (canada.ca)
  3. Housing Accelerator Fund — Building more homes, faster (cmhc-schl.gc.ca)
  4. “In fact, infrastructure upgrading and replacement in built-up areas, which is required due to obsolescence or breakdown as much as through infill growth, is often more expensive than in the tabula rasa of greenfield areas.” (ir.lib.uwo.ca)
  5. Ontario passes housing bill amid criticism from cities, conservation authorities (cbc.ca)
  6. Carolyn Parrish - ‘Our taxpayers are the ones that are going to be hit by hell,’ said Parrish at a Mississauga emergency meeting on the bill this past week.” (thestar.com)
  7. “Montréal stood out as the only market that recorded a significant decline across all housing types.” (cmhc-schl.gc.ca)
  8. Building more homes can combat rising rents (bloomberg.com)
  9. Montréal demande l’aide de Québec pour s’attaquer au logement social et aux transports (ledevoir.com)
  10. La CMM demande la collaboration du gouvernement pour favoriser un aménagement durable du Grand Montréal (cmm.qc.ca)
  11. Montréal interpelle Québec sur le logement et le transport Montréal interpelle Québec sur le logement et le transport (lapresse.ca)
  12. “unlike many American municipalities, Canadian municipalities that approve new development do not reap the benefits from a growth in sales tax collection” (ir.lib.uwo.ca)
  13. “the magnitude of most government charge sub-types in Montréal is generally much lower” (chmc-schl.gc.ca)
  14. “This includes water, wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste infrastructure to support the construction of more homes.” (infrastructure.gc.ca)
  15. Quartier Namur-Hippodrome : un projet inclusif et résilient (montreal.ca)
  16. Canada Rental Protection Fund (pm.gc.ca)
  17. “federal government’s forthcoming public transit fund, municipalities will be required to take action that will directly unlock housing supply” (pm.gc.ca)
  18. “This includes measures to: -Eliminate all mandatory minimum parking requirements within 800 meters of a high-frequency transit line. -Allow high-density housing within 800 meters of a high-frequency transit line.” (pm.gc.ca)
  19. “should be among the first provinces to receive support” (mapleridgenews.com)
  20. “If a province doesn’t agree to the federal government’s conditions by Jan. 1, 2025, the Prime Minister’s Office said the funding would be transferred to municipalities instead.” (globalnews.ca)
  21. “3.11. Except to the extent expressly provided for by law, no municipal body or school body may, without the prior authorization of the Government, enter into any agreement with another government in Canada or one of its departments or government agencies, or with a federal public agency.” (sqrc.gouv.qc.ca)
  22. “Similarly, Quebec officials criticized the federal government’s approach, accusing Ottawa of encroaching on provincial jurisdiction and urging it to instead address housing through issues such as immigration, which are under federal control” “St-Pierre Plamondon claimed the federal government has moved to encroach on Quebec's jurisdiction, including on housing” (financialpost.com)

Construisons Montréal

Get Involved

Be part of the change, join our events, conversation groups and act with us! We communicate through various networks, help us build the future of Montreal!

Langue/Language

2024More Montreal